September 24th, 2007 by Josh Gillespie

Is Bayh the Guy? Short Answer, No!

The blogs are abuzz about a column written by Russ Pulliam in the Indianapolis Star this past weekend. In it, Mr. Pulliam makes the case that Senator Bayh is the logical, if not perfect, choice to round out Hillary’s eventual Democrat nomination for president. Then word gets out yesterday that Bayh is set to announce his endorsement for Hillary today sometime only adding more fuel to the fire that is speculation. But let’s take a look at Senator Bayh’s chances.

Mr. Pulliam put forth an argument that would endear Bayh to conservative Democrats (yes, they actually exist…somewhere) while at the same time proving that Hillary needs somebody to counteract her polarizing nature. But let’s be honest. While the argument is good for some people, most everybody should see right through the argument to Bayh’s do-nothing time as Governor to his do-nothing time as a Senator.

He is polite and charming. He’s been an articulate spokesman for fatherhood, even writing a book on the subject. As Indiana’s governor, he promoted the fatherhood movement and offered other culturally conservative initiatives. He didn’t serve liquor at the governor’s mansion and reinstated Gideons Bibles in state park inns after an overzealous official thought they violated the First Amendment.

As governor, Bayh was the opposite of Mitch Daniels, who never seems to shy from taking on controversial issues such as daylight-saving time or leasing the Toll Road. Bayh took a stab at education reform but never put a definitive stamp on a particular policy or issue. He did, however, win elections and returned Indiana to a competitive two-party state.

(Read more below the fold)

As a voter, let me ask what’s the big flippin’ deal? All of those are good qualities, I guess, but it’s not what makes you a candidate to be Vice President. Well, maybe it does for Hillary, who makes Evan Bayh look like James Dobson. Let’s not also forget that Senator Bayh presidential candidacy faded faster than the Houston Texans hopes for a 2007 Super Bowl. The thing is, Evan Bayh isn’t flashy enough for Hillary Clinton. But then again, I would have said the same thing about Al “the world is coming to an end” Gore, whose personality during the entire Clinton administration was stiffer than Marcel Marceau’s remains.

I also question the teaming of two Senators on the same ticket. It didn’t work for John Kerry and John Edwards and I can’t even think of the last two Senators who teamed together on the Presidential ticket for a winning combination. (I will say that a Hillary/Obama ticket could work, but the ego’s might be too much.)

It seems too early to start talking about who is going to be Hillary’s running mate. She hasn’t even wrapped up the nomination (but enough with semantics). In the long run though, it could be wise to start throwing out more conservative/moderate choices who could balance out Hillary’s wildly liberal views. Even Democrats around here are worried about her getting the nod because of her liberalism.

Then again, Republicans are having the same conversation about Rudy Giuliani and his liberal social views. The difference though, is that even though Rudy is out of touch with social conservatives, they still like Rudy personally. I don’t think the same could be said of Hillary and conservative to moderate Democrats.

8 Responses to “Is Bayh the Guy? Short Answer, No!”

  1. Sir Hailstone Says:
    September 24th, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    Little Birch will get the nod for Veep if it shows Indiana can vote blue in 2008 for the first time in 44 years. That ain’t happening.

    My money is on Hillary picking former Energy Secretary Bill Richardson as her running mate for her third term as President.

  2. “I can’t even think of the last two Senators who teamed together on the Presidential ticket for a winning combination.”

    John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson.

    There are a number of popular red state or swing state governors that are Democrats that would make far more sense for Hillary to pick than Evan Bayh.

    Assuming a roughly static map to the last two presidential elections (which is assuming a lot given the state of the Republican Party nationally right now), she only needs to pry off one state. Strickland can do that for her in Ohio, Richardson in New Mexico, or several others.

  3. Of course, Kennedy/Johnson! But if I remember correctly, even that was a forced marriage of convenience at the time so that Kennedy would have a prayer of winning over protestants in the bible belt.

    As a student of politics and history I can’t believe I forgot that pairing. Thanks for reminder Scott.

  4. According to Blue Indiana through a press release via Hillary Clinton’s website, Evan Bayh has been named a national co-chair to her campaign. Interesting.

    http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=3429

  5. I think it will come down to who can deliver a critical state that Clinton/democratic candidate would need. I’m still not convinced that Bayh can deliver Indiana to vote for a Clinton (or other democratic) presidency.

    I’d look for a nominee with more southern/western appeal.

    If Bayh was from Ohio/Florida he would be a much more ideal VP candidate for Clinton.

  6. Making him a campaign co-chair is the sort of sop you give to someone so they don’t seem too disappointed when you have no intention of making them your VP pick, but still covet their endorsement.

  7. eduard daniels Says:
    October 16th, 2007 at 3:37 pm

    Bill Richardson could deliver New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada and Arizona and the hubby Bill could deliver Arkansas. Just do the math and it all makes sense.

  8. I agree. Bill Richardson is the obvious and most likely pick for Hillary’s VP.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove that you're not a bot, enter this code
Anti-Spam Image