Comments on: Hillary Plants Question at GOP Debate

By: Josh Gillespie

Josh Gillespie — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:56:18 +0000

So long ewe!

By: ewe

ewe — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:50:40 +0000

I am not interested in your blog any further then. My comment to Brian was appropriate and i could care less about your definition of morality through expressive language. You censor posts. Don’t dress it up and don’t you dare blame me. You are a disgrace to everything you think you stand up for and speak on behalf of. And more importantly you are a danger which i will not support. Good riddance to you Josh Gillespie.

By: Josh Gillespie

Josh Gillespie — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:30:43 +0000

Ewe,

While I appreciate your getting involved with the conversation, your comment goes against our very first rule when posting here which is “There will be no profanity, no personal attacks, harassment or demonization of a particular individual.”

Please follow the rules or don’t participate here at all. Since you did break the first rule, I’m deleting your comment regarding Brian. That comment was hateful and unwarrented since Brian was only making an observation.

You may still participate, I just ask that abide by our rules of posting.

By: ewe

ewe — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:16:32 +0000

No, Anderson Cooper backtracked because him and his army of media agents do not want the mainstream hatemongers such as Fox News Channel to drag him out of the closet for being gay. Remember when they bascically threatened just that a while back by calling him “the paris hilton of journalism” Just another reason why it is so important for Anderson Cooper to admit he is gay and move on from there free from further blackmail and harassment. Free from ignorant bloggers with their own narrow minded discriminatory agendas as well.
Grip reality Rupugnants.

By: ewe

ewe — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:40:49 +0000

Republicrats and Democans have very little diversity. VOTE THIRD PARTY. THERE IS STILL TIME.

By: ewe

ewe — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:36:12 +0000

FYI: Not all gay people are for Hillary Clinton. Stop stereotyping whole groups of people. It shows your ignorance. Secondly, even if what you say is true which i doubt, SO WHAT. Republicans are finally admitting they only field questions and answer those they approve of beforehand. Thats not the democracy i want to live in and i suggest you reevaluate your own misguide dogma.

By: Brian Sikma

Brian Sikma — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:40:03 +0000

I noticed that he did have a long time to make his viewpoint known.

By: Joel Harris

Joel Harris — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:37:20 +0000

By the way. The bigger issue that I had with General Kerr was not his ties to the Clinton administration, but rather that he was allowed to talk for 30 seconds to a minute simply editorializing.

By: Joel Harris

Joel Harris — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:35:26 +0000

I watched a bunch of it off of YouTube. It was awful. The questions were bad. The moderator was horrible. It was probably as bad as any debate for distributing time across the different candidates. Of course, I also think there were too many candidates. Ron Paul is just a bit of entertainment; Hunter and Toncredo should not be asked.

Fred was said to want a round table discussion format with no moderator with no more than 4 candidates at a time. Great idea, if someone can make it happen.

By: Scott

Scott — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:26:34 +0000

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transexual Americans For Hillary Steering Committee?

Wow. Did you pull that name out of your butt? Do you even realize that no one has called transgender people “transexual” since about the mid-80’s? That it’s considered about as offensive as “homosexual?” I’m just going to hazard a guess that a steering committee from Hillary based on LGBT issues probably wouldn’t use an offensive name for the committee.

Bil, if you’re offended, I suggest that you take it up with Jonathan Garthwaite, the quoted author.

Anyhow, General Kerr wasn’t the only questioner in the CNN debate with ties to various Democratic campaigns or supportive organizations.