The Star Self-Censors
Tom Rose, who wrote the below article, contacted the Indianapolis Star to see if they could perhaps run a toned-down and shortened version of the op-ed before the election. Rose was seeking to draw attention to the media’s failure to carefully scrutinize Andre Carson’s faith while at the same time having no qualms about reviewing the faith of other candidates, an example being former-GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, a follower of the Mormon faith.
The Star told Rose that they could not publish his article because it was to close to the election and Carson would not be able to adequately respond. Yet Rose’s article does not attack Carson but rather asks questions and makes careful charges against the mainstream media for its failure to give Carson a chance to distinguish himself from other, less freedom loving, Muslims.
The real crux of this incident is not Carson’s personal faith, but the unwillingness of the media in general to defend its own values system while asking serious questions of a values system who’s adherents often make declarations against the foundations of freedom. A culture, and a media, that is unwilling to believe in the goodness of its own values system is a culture-or media-that is quite unsure of its identity.








March 8th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
Brian! Listen to yourself! You’re going after Carson for his adherence to religion, some of whose adherents would limit freedom. Yet you are an adherent of a narrow view of our own religion, which narrow view would limit the freedom of your countrymen for no reason other than you disagree with us.
If anyone were to try to take Carson on for these points of yours, (which points I do believe lack merit, by the way) you should leave it to someone who can’t be accused of a self-serving philosophical incongruity.