Comments on: Indiana Voter I.D. Law Upheld http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/ HoosierAccess.com Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:11:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Michael Jezierski http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3022 Michael Jezierski Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:57:08 +0000 http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3022 "It was a “splintered” decision, sez AP, but an analysis of the opinions show that the six majority Justices differed only on how to get from point A to point B." Moonbats of AP. Considering the journalist mutual admiration society bestowed an honor upon Matt Tully, this really doth bode poorly for the journalism profession. A question of "Does the sun shine?" would lead to a 6-3 decision of SCOTUS with this court's makeup. Bader-Ginsburg herself would likely proclaim the sun as unconstitutional because it could cause global warming. “It was a “splintered” decision, sez AP, but an analysis of the opinions show that the six majority Justices differed only on how to get from point A to point B.”

Moonbats of AP. Considering the journalist mutual admiration society bestowed an honor upon Matt Tully, this really doth bode poorly for the journalism profession.

A question of “Does the sun shine?” would lead to a 6-3 decision of SCOTUS with this court’s makeup. Bader-Ginsburg herself would likely proclaim the sun as unconstitutional because it could cause global warming.

]]> By: Nathan Brindle http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3018 Nathan Brindle Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:14:43 +0000 http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3018 Oh, and "There is little history in Indiana of either in-person voter fraud — of the sort the law was designed to thwart (...)" How would we know that, exactly? :D Oh, and

“There is little history in Indiana of either in-person voter fraud — of the sort the law was designed to thwart (…)”

How would we know that, exactly? :D

]]> By: scratchman http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3017 scratchman Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:13:05 +0000 http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3017 I never understood how anyone in their right mind could say that this law was racist or was aimed at any specific group... I never understood how anyone in their right mind could say that this law was racist or was aimed at any specific group…

]]> By: Nathan Brindle http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3016 Nathan Brindle Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:12:11 +0000 http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3016 I love the over the top language. It was a "splintered" decision, sez AP, but an analysis of the opinions show that the six majority Justices differed only on how to get from point A to point B. The mechanics are irrelevant -- all six got safely to "We affirm." Some "splintered" decision! The only splinter here is the one in the AP's eye. What there ought to be is a law restricting the inflammation index of political news articles. But that's OK. Just put some ice on it, AP. I love the over the top language. It was a “splintered” decision, sez AP, but an analysis of the opinions show that the six majority Justices differed only on how to get from point A to point B. The mechanics are irrelevant — all six got safely to “We affirm.” Some “splintered” decision! The only splinter here is the one in the AP’s eye.

What there ought to be is a law restricting the inflammation index of political news articles. But that’s OK. Just put some ice on it, AP.

]]> By: Michael Jezierski http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3007 Michael Jezierski Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:16:51 +0000 http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/04/28/indiana-voter-id-law-upheld/#comment-3007 YES!!!!!! *fist pump in the air* I'm amazed the moonbat Justice Stevens actually voted to uphold the law on a 6-3 vote. AG candidate Greg Zoeller said he (speaking for *himself*, not the AG's office) thought it would be 5-4 and which way that went all depended upon Justice Kennedy. We now have at least one protection of our votes not being cancelled out by the Crown Hill Precinct. YES!!!!!! *fist pump in the air*

I’m amazed the moonbat Justice Stevens actually voted to uphold the law on a 6-3 vote. AG candidate Greg Zoeller said he (speaking for *himself*, not the AG’s office) thought it would be 5-4 and which way that went all depended upon Justice Kennedy.

We now have at least one protection of our votes not being cancelled out by the Crown Hill Precinct.

]]>