<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Time to Act on Energy Policy is Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/</link>
	<description>HoosierAccess.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: daltonsbriefs</title>
		<link>http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3972</link>
		<dc:creator>daltonsbriefs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3972</guid>
		<description>Although I agree that our nation should allow itself to drill for oil, anywhere.  I am also convinced that this runup to $4.00 gasoline in kicking in a ton of innovation and science in favor of more renewable energy.  It seems every day we get another story about another break-thru.  I'm with Mr. Puckett though, I'm worried that government will get in the way, and regulate us right back to the dark ages.

One I found today http://nwiconnect.blogspot.com/2008/06/energy-as-next-manhattan-project.html
Just think what enviro wackos like Donnely would do with that kind of project to slow it down, maybe find some wetlands, or an butterfly to protect, or let some trial lawyers sue them out of existence before they can bring the project to profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree that our nation should allow itself to drill for oil, anywhere.  I am also convinced that this runup to $4.00 gasoline in kicking in a ton of innovation and science in favor of more renewable energy.  It seems every day we get another story about another break-thru.  I&#8217;m with Mr. Puckett though, I&#8217;m worried that government will get in the way, and regulate us right back to the dark ages.</p>
<p>One I found today <a href="http://nwiconnect.blogspot.com/2008/06/energy-as-next-manhattan-project.html" rel="nofollow">http://nwiconnect.blogspot.com/2008/06/energy-as-next-manhattan-project.html</a><br />
Just think what enviro wackos like Donnely would do with that kind of project to slow it down, maybe find some wetlands, or an butterfly to protect, or let some trial lawyers sue them out of existence before they can bring the project to profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Harris</title>
		<link>http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3956</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3956</guid>
		<description>CNS News has reported that Cheney is admitting that China is not drilling off the cost. Apparently someone is doing exploration out there, but not drilling. Cheney is still asserting that China has contracts and this is disputed, though I am not sure of anyone's true source on this.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200806/NAT20080613b.html

Once again, this is an irrelevant distraction from the real issues out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNS News has reported that Cheney is admitting that China is not drilling off the cost. Apparently someone is doing exploration out there, but not drilling. Cheney is still asserting that China has contracts and this is disputed, though I am not sure of anyone&#8217;s true source on this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200806/NAT20080613b.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200806/NAT20080613b.html</a></p>
<p>Once again, this is an irrelevant distraction from the real issues out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Sikma</title>
		<link>http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3952</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Sikma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3952</guid>
		<description>In response to mikeyc252's assertion that China and Cuba are in fact not collaborating and drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, I'd like to point out a few things.

First, the link that they use to back up their information is a link to a leftist rag that passess off liberal talking points from the 1960s and '70s as serious news and comentary.  It's hardly a credible source.

Secondly, even as recently as this month the respected Investor's Business Daily (a publication more credible than the one mentioned above) has commented on the alliance between Cuba and China and the off-shore drilling project.

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=297904745555169&#38;kw=China,Cuba,oil

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=297645188487872&#38;kw=China,Cuba,oil

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=296435488187160&#38;kw=China,Cuba,oil

Disclosure, I am the Deputy Communications Director for Luke Puckett for Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to mikeyc252&#8217;s assertion that China and Cuba are in fact not collaborating and drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, I&#8217;d like to point out a few things.</p>
<p>First, the link that they use to back up their information is a link to a leftist rag that passess off liberal talking points from the 1960s and &#8217;70s as serious news and comentary.  It&#8217;s hardly a credible source.</p>
<p>Secondly, even as recently as this month the respected Investor&#8217;s Business Daily (a publication more credible than the one mentioned above) has commented on the alliance between Cuba and China and the off-shore drilling project.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=297904745555169&amp;kw=China,Cuba,oil" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=297904745555169&amp;kw=China,Cuba,oil</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=297645188487872&amp;kw=China,Cuba,oil" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=297645188487872&amp;kw=China,Cuba,oil</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=296435488187160&amp;kw=China,Cuba,oil" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=296435488187160&amp;kw=China,Cuba,oil</a></p>
<p>Disclosure, I am the Deputy Communications Director for Luke Puckett for Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Harris</title>
		<link>http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3951</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3951</guid>
		<description>Cheney has admitted that the facts that he was using were not correct, though it was widely reported in 2006 that Cuba and China had come to an agreement to do so.

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/china_starts_oil_drilling.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/09/news/cuba.php
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=19479

Is it really important? The Dems still tell Bush to go to OPEC and get them to increase capacity, but are unwilling to increase domestic capacity. I don't care if the Chinese (or Cubans) were drilling or not. IT JUST MAKES SENSE FOR US TO DRILL.

But you are complaining about pretty much the smallest point in Mr. Puckett's argument. Care to take on the larger points of the argument?

By the way: www.americansolutions.com is up to almost 3/4 of a million signatures on their petition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheney has admitted that the facts that he was using were not correct, though it was widely reported in 2006 that Cuba and China had come to an agreement to do so.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/china_starts_oil_drilling.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/china_starts_oil_drilling.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/09/news/cuba.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/09/news/cuba.php</a><br />
<a href="http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=19479" rel="nofollow">http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=19479</a></p>
<p>Is it really important? The Dems still tell Bush to go to OPEC and get them to increase capacity, but are unwilling to increase domestic capacity. I don&#8217;t care if the Chinese (or Cubans) were drilling or not. IT JUST MAKES SENSE FOR US TO DRILL.</p>
<p>But you are complaining about pretty much the smallest point in Mr. Puckett&#8217;s argument. Care to take on the larger points of the argument?</p>
<p>By the way: <a href="http://www.americansolutions.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.americansolutions.com</a> is up to almost 3/4 of a million signatures on their petition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeyc252</title>
		<link>http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3946</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeyc252</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/06/13/the-time-to-act-on-energy-policy-is-now/#comment-3946</guid>
		<description>Nice try, but China isn't actually drilling there.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/06/8678_gop_claims_chin.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try, but China isn&#8217;t actually drilling there.<br />
<a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/06/8678_gop_claims_chin.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/06/8678_gop_claims_chin.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
