Comments on: Dan Quayle Respects Barack Obama http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/07/02/dan-quayle-respects-barack-obama/ HoosierAccess.com Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:38:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Joel Harris http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/07/02/dan-quayle-respects-barack-obama/#comment-4258 Joel Harris Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:53:37 +0000 http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/07/02/dan-quayle-respects-barack-obama/#comment-4258 It is a different kind of IQ. I think it has more to do with philosophy than anything else. Liberals tend to be "enlightened" intellectuals (i.e. elites). Conservatives tend to be more...practical? Business? Something like that. Maybe just "unenlightened". It is a different kind of IQ. I think it has more to do with philosophy than anything else. Liberals tend to be “enlightened” intellectuals (i.e. elites). Conservatives tend to be more…practical? Business? Something like that. Maybe just “unenlightened”.

]]> By: Nathan Brindle http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/07/02/dan-quayle-respects-barack-obama/#comment-4257 Nathan Brindle Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:38:56 +0000 http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/07/02/dan-quayle-respects-barack-obama/#comment-4257 Quayle is not as stupid as the Left would like you to believe he is...potato or no potatoe. :) I've always assumed that the Left plays the stupid card against the Right because it's overcompensating for its own low IQ. You have to be pretty stupid to vote for Democrats, after all. Quayle is not as stupid as the Left would like you to believe he is…potato or no potatoe. :)

I’ve always assumed that the Left plays the stupid card against the Right because it’s overcompensating for its own low IQ. You have to be pretty stupid to vote for Democrats, after all.

]]> By: Joel Harris http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/07/02/dan-quayle-respects-barack-obama/#comment-4249 Joel Harris Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:01:22 +0000 http://hoosieraccess.com/blog/2008/07/02/dan-quayle-respects-barack-obama/#comment-4249 I think Quayle's analysis is pretty much on target. I think Quayle’s analysis is pretty much on target.

]]>