I wrote an article recently offering commentary on Wal-Mart holding meetings with managers and impending union “card check” laws, where union bosses could put undue influence onto employees into signing their indentures. My response to “card check” was for Indiana to finally pass a Right to Work law.

Now, I see on the Indiana Chamber blog the chairman of the State Chamber has written a piece offering his insight into why Indiana needs a Right to Work law. Here’s some of the highlights:

“In a 2002 study entitled “The Effect of Right-to-Work Laws on Economic Development,” economist William T. Wilson of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy compared Michigan’s economic performance to right-to-work states. Wilson found that during the 30 years between 1970 and 2000, RTW states created jobs nearly twice as fast as did Michigan

and

“There are practical reasons for Indiana to adopt a right-to-work law. First, Hoosiers agree with it. An overwhelming majority – 71 percent – favored or strongly favored right to work in a 2007 statewide survey”

“There is also the broader moral question of whether a Hoosier breadwinner should be forced to join and/or pay dues to a labor organization to get or keep a job.”

Paying dues which in turn contribute to anti-life and anti-freedom political candidates which the employee may not support.

Unions had their place in the early 20th Century, in the days of the GM “sit down strike” bringing increased employee compensation and awareness of safety into the industrial workplace. However that mindset has changed among employers, modern unions seem to operate as simply political contribution collectors from workers to contribute to anti-life socialist political candidates.

[H/T The Indiana Chamber Blog]


3 Responses
  1. “Paying dues which in turn contribute to anti-life and anti-freedom political candidates which the employee may not support.”

    That’s not true. Federal law prohibits use of union dues to support political candidates.

    When I was younger, I strongly was in favor of “right to work” laws. These days, it seems like the issue is rapidly becoming as relevant as buggy whips.

    Three hundred years ago, slavery was needed to economically produce the goods and services. One hundred years ago, wage-slaves in large organizations were needed to economically produce goods and services. One hundred years from now, we’ll be back to the era of small crofters.

    Computers and the internet are making custom production more affordable; there’s so much waste involved in mass production. We won’t have “jobs” as such; we’ll pretty much be self-employed, or engaged in small partnerships.

    Unions make sense when there are massive numbers of employees. They are a management tool, embraced by smart managers. There’s no way to deal with 4,000 employees, but if there’s a union, you can deal with 1 union. Bad unions result from bad management; by treating workers with respect from the start, good managers get good unions – and good unions make good managers look ever better.

    The stats being quoted are misleading as well. Jobs aren’t being “created” in RTW states. They’re being “relocated” as companies are discarding their old workforce, people that often have destroyed their health out of loyalty to their employer, and they’re building new facilities with young gullible workforces. And then they complain that they can’t find skilled workers!

    Posted by harldelos on August 5th, 2008 at 7:54 am |

  2. “Federal law prohibits use of union dues to support political candidates.”

    Uh-huh. I’ll believe unions obey that law when they find Jimmy Hoffa (the old man not the son the present Teamsters boss) under the end zone at Giants’ stadium.

    “They are a management tool, embraced by smart managers.” – oh so you embrace the “Company Unions”? I have no use for those either. Prime example – Kroger and the UFCW. I never could figure out what one receives in benefit when belonging to a union, paying union dues, and making minimum wage stocking shelves at Kroger.

    Going off the beaten path – you have the French. “It’s Tuesday! Let’s Strike!”

    Posted by Michael Jezierski on August 5th, 2008 at 8:34 am |

  3. “Federal law prohibits use of union dues to support political candidates.”

    Riiiiight…..SEIU anyone?

    Posted by scratchman on August 5th, 2008 at 3:35 pm |

   
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to comment.
Your Reply:

Secured by Super-CAPTCHA © 2009 MLW & Associates, LLP. All rights reserved.