Greg Zoeller & Tony Bennett on School Discipline
From the NWI Times:
Stopping in Crown Point Monday, two statewide GOP candidates announced how they would support the governor’s initiative of restoring discipline to classrooms.
Superintendent of Public Instruction candidate Tony Bennett and Attorney General candidate Greg Zoeller praised Gov. Mitch Daniels’ idea of providing legal immunity for teachers who “act in good faith to preserve order in their classrooms or other school settings.” Daniels, who is seeking re-election against Democrat Jill Long Thompson, wants to ask the General Assembly to pass the proposed law next year.
Zoeller said school boards often have trouble with the cost of defense, which can run around $20,000, so many school boards opt for settling. He said once the new law is passed, if a teacher is threatened with litigation and the school board decides that the teacher acted appropriately, then he has a client.
“I’m going to come in with everything I’ve got,” he said, adding neither the teacher nor the school board will be financially responsible for the defense. “There won’t be any settlements … We don’t settle cases.”
(Read more after the leap)
Bennett, the superintendent for the Greater Clark County Schools, said the initiative would resurrect the climate of excellence in schools with high expectations and strong discipline. He said it could help schools run more efficiently and would help recruit and retain teachers because they’ll be secure in their authority.
The Zoeller quote deserves repeating:
“There won’t be any settlements… We don’t settle cases.”
It will be a big change for these extortion artists to go up against someone that’s not willing to cry uncle and just write them a check to make them just go away.
Greg Zoeller, as Linda Pence can tell you, runs the sort of shop that makes other lawyers and their clients cry uncle and write a check to make the AG’s office just go away.








August 27th, 2008 at 6:07 pm
So I guess that means the legal fees to defend the school come out of our state taxes instead of the local taxes? Does that make it cheaper?
Bill Starr
Columbus, Indiana
Wed, 27 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm EDT
August 27th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
Good question.
August 27th, 2008 at 11:12 pm
So if a school board determines that a teacher acted appropriately, our tax dollars will go to defend the teacher?!! School boards will most likely always defend the teachers; otherwise, it exposes the school corporation to liability. School boards are hardly unbiased arbitors of justice. This does not seem like a fair way of assessing whether or not a teacher acted appropriately. I’m tired of reading and seeing news accounts of teachers molesting students or abusing them verbally and physically. That’s why schools ban cell phones, because the cameras have caught too many teachers acting inappropriately. Sometimes teachers do behave inappropriately and they should be held accountable for their actions. Who will be protecting the interests of students? This is not an example of good government!
August 27th, 2008 at 11:21 pm
Might, instead of their camera feature, cell phones be banned because students would use them during classes to call and text each other, distracting from the learning process (or even going so far as to utilize them to cheat on tests and so forth)?
August 28th, 2008 at 10:26 am
When I was but a lowly pupil at Ye Olde Warren(e?) Central(another “e”?) we were never allowed to use those new fangled cellular telephones for the reasons that master Scott has formerly aforementioned. Hitherto and forward (and yon?), the reason I persisted in maintaining the company of my own cellular telephone was because of the most tragic events that unfolded on April the twentieth, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred ninety and nine. in Littleton, Colorado…
ok so sue me–I wanted to be long winded…