October 14th, 2008 by Josh Gillespie

There Was a Debate Tonight?

If you sat through tonight’s debate and hadn’t seen the other two, you didn’t miss anything.  Just a few highlights.

  • For what seemed like the first half hour, we got everybody’s personal story (and I swear it seemed like for the the 5,000th time, we heard that JLT grew up on a farm, has a some high falutin’ degrees of some sort and she’s pretty ticked off about all the change that needs changing except it’s not change)
  • Andy Horning mentioned the constitution in one single answer a total of eight times
  • JLT’s ethics code while a congresswoman was to not drink the soft drinks the lobbyists provided at receptions.

That’s pretty much it. So let me plug my appearance on Abdul tomorrow morning.

I’m going to be on Abdul in the Morning tomorrow morning at 7:10am with Blue Indiana’s Thomas Cook to talk about the shindig in Bloomington this evening and to talk about tomorrow night’s final presidential debate.

So tune in WXNT 1430am at 7:10am or log on to the WXNT website to hear the live stream.

7 Responses to “There Was a Debate Tonight?”

  1. What about the part where Jill Long-Thompson accused Daniels of losing millions (when it’s actually billions) in PERF, TRF, and Major Moves funds? That was the best exchange of the whole campaign season. OH, I guess you wouldn’t mention that because it questions the prudence of Daniels management.

  2. I think you got off easy — no Obama talk this time, friend. Your time will come!

  3. First of all Chris, if that is your painfully objective analysis, it’s pretty one sided. But I’m just guessing you fail to understand how state government, and in turn, state investments work. All investments of state money is made by the State Treasurer (I’ll do you a favor and keep you from looking up who it is and tell you it’s Richard Mourdock).

    Now, if you’re as painfully objective as you claim (which by your comment leads me to believe your objectivity lies in JLT press releases or random statements she doesn’t back up in debates) you’ll actually contact the State Treasurer’s office and you’ll find out that what JLT and other liberal blogs have spouted is a dubious claim at best that borders on scaring people to vote for her.

    Now sit back and do your homework before you go around writing comments on blogs.

  4. Yep, no presidential talk. I thought we we’re going to talk at least a little bit about it. Next time I guess.

  5. Michael Jezierski Says:
    October 15th, 2008 at 8:36 am

    Josh - you seem to have the most posts here on Hoosier Access. Now I don’t want to punish you, but we should make it fairer for the folks behind you. So I think we should spread it around.

  6. redistribution of posts. mike?

  7. Actually to have a correct redistribution, I should go back into my many posts and reassign different names to them. Even though I did all the work, others should take credit. Is that what you’re going for Mike? :)

Leave a Reply

*
To prove that you're not a bot, enter this code
Anti-Spam Image