Congressman Dan Burton did a question and answer session with 300 employees of Sallie Mae in Fishers this afternoon.  He addressed them in response to President Obama’s budget, which just passed the House, and includes language that proposes changing the student loan program which, depending upon the details of the plan, could threaten the jobs at Sallie Mae’s Fishers office and more than 2,300 Sallie Mae jobs across the state.

The Congressman encouraged them by saying he was a firm believer in that the private sector can do a better job in dealing in the area of student loans than the government does citing inefficiency in government controlled entities.  He ended his opening remarks, which didn’t last for more than a few minutes before devoting the rest of the time to Q&A, by saying that he will do everything in his power that he can to make sure that the student loan program remains with Sallie Mae as a main participant.

Just for a little background into all of this, student loan providers who participate in the Family Federal Education Loan (FFEL) program are worried that a single federal system that services everyone will not be able to meet student lending needs.

(Read more after the leap)

It introduces new operational risks. It requires a wholesale transition whereby the Department of Education is solely responsible for a loan delivery system valued in the billions of dollars annually. The whole loan origination and delivery system could run aground.

80% of schools who have chosen to rely on private sector loan origination services would be forced to convert to the Direct Loan (DL), or government operated system. This eliminates consumer choice and competition in loan delivery and support. Market-driven competition sparks innovation, produces cost savings, and enhances customer service.

Schools will face transition burdens and borrowers will be deprived of value-added services like financial literacy tools, default prevention programs, and proven customer service.

What does this mean for Sallie Mae and it’s thousands of employees in Indiana? The real possibility of dismantling the existing infrastructure and the thousands of jobs associated with it.

At the conclusion of his meeting, Burton responded to his meeting with Sallie Mae employees by saying:

“Jobs are just about everything to my constituents. In this very tough economy, the Obama administration is trying to expand government control to the point where they are going to suck the wind out of the private sector in central Indiana. The employees I spoke with at Sallie Mae today are staring that reality in the face, and I came here to let them know that I’m supportive of them and their company.

“Sallie Mae has an extremely important role in higher education, and, in the long run, direct lending from the Federal government will be less efficient, more costly, and their service will pale in comparison to what Sallie Mae offers students today. Above all, a transition to government control of student loans will cost Sallie Mae thousands of jobs. I think that is wrong, and I will do everything possible to make sure the Federal government does not replace Sallie Mae.”


10 Responses
  1. Given that if I had the power, I would shutter the “Department of Education” tomorrow, I really don’t want to see any more statist initiatives pushed through.

    [Yes, I used "scare quotes". The government scares me, OK?]

    Posted by Parker on April 7th, 2009 at 3:47 pm |

  2. Hmmm… could this be some sort of a larger program where the Government will forgive these loans in exchange for a stint in a volunteer service corps of some kind?

    Posted by Michael Jezierski on April 7th, 2009 at 5:53 pm |

  3. Nice to see Mr. Burton actually out and about, for something beyond his golf tournament at least. The 5th CD can thank John McGoff for that.

    Posted by Jacob Perry on April 8th, 2009 at 8:19 am |

  4. “Sallie Mae has an extremely important role in higher education, and, in the long run, direct lending from the Federal government will be less efficient, more costly, and their service will pale in comparison to what Sallie Mae offers students today.”

    Are you kidding Mr. Burton ????? Just google Sallie Mae and you will find an almost 100% negative rating from borrowers on their service. It is just the opposite of what Mr. Burton says. This is a horrible company who has enslaved a whole generation of young people who made the mistake of pursing the American dream of education and the more costly mistake of getting directed to any loan originated or serviced by Sallie Mae. Nope, the government needs to take back this role to save future students from the horrors of Sallie Mae. Sorry……they have earned their reputation. Just ask anyone who has had the misfortune of a Sallie Mae loan.

    Posted by GD on April 8th, 2009 at 8:40 am |

  5. So Jacob, who will you be supporting in the race? McGoff or Messer? :)

    And GD, I had a Sallie Mae load. My experience w/Sallie Mae was nothing short of great. Maybe those who didn’t have a great experience were disappointed that they actually had to pay back their loan rather than get a free education. Life sucks when you have to a pay an obligation back, huh?

    Posted by Josh Gillespie on April 8th, 2009 at 8:57 am |

  6. Well Josh, congratulations – you are one of a very small handful that had anything other than a horrible experience. Don’t believe me. Go on the internet and google Sallie Mae and you will find hundreds of millions of comments, all in the negative category. As far as paying back my loan, no problem. The problem is paying back 3 or 4 times the amount I borrowed due to usury, tactics utilized to increase the balance, etc. Again, don’t believe me, it is very well documented so…..life sucks when you are taken advantage of by a private consumer loan for profit company that has been given exceptions by Congress that no other company has been given in the history of our country. Please get your facts straight before you judge.

    Posted by GD on April 8th, 2009 at 1:51 pm |

  7. Are you judging without all the facts? Did all those people who have written their stories or posted them to youtube give you all the facts? Do you have Sallie Mae’s side of the story or did you just quickly judge yourself?

    Seems like you should get your facts straight too before believing everything you read on the internet. Seems all too often people are quick to judge if someone offers of up a sob story on being screwed by some giant company and all of the sudden it’s the company’s fault. I believe there are two sides to every story. Could Sallie Mae be at fault for some things? Probably, but the federal government has screwed far more people than Sallie Mae could ever hope to. So forgive me if I would like the Fed to stay out of the student loan business.

    Posted by Josh Gillespie on April 8th, 2009 at 2:00 pm |

  8. My facts come from my own experience first and they are supported by millions of others who happen to post them on the internet. I have the same experiences so……….you can see that my facts are supported by other people’s experiences that are the same. No, sorry, I cannot say anything positive about this company and I believe that the borrowers would be better served by the Federal government rather than this company.

    Posted by GD on April 8th, 2009 at 2:14 pm |

  9. Instead of subsidized private loans with a high interest, why not cut the subsidies altogether and take out loans with a miniscule interest rate, provided directly by the government?

    Of course, not like any GOPers care about the cost of education. The education bubble is about to burst, and all us high schoolers hear is “apply for scholarships.” We have to go to college to get a job. Unless we go to a reputable university or only take vocational classes, we won’t get a job. If you we go to a reputable university, our family is expected to pay a quarter, a third of their income under FAFSA and CSS. If we do go to a reputable university, we have $100000 in debt to pay off, and life is put on hold.

    Until the education bubble bursts, anyone that wants to go to college and not spend 4 years in a technical school is going to get screwed.

    Posted by Michael Carper on April 9th, 2009 at 7:33 pm |

  10. Michael if I read your post right you are in high school. Please accept some unsolicited advise that will serve you well. Never, ever, ever take out a private student loan. I would follow this list in the exact order regarding college:

    AP classes that translate into college credit
    Community College and then transfer into University
    In State University (believe me but for a few exceptions, it doesn’t matter much where you go but make sure they are accredited)

    I would follow this list in the exact order regarding paying for college:

    Scholarships & Grants (look under every rock and start early and maybe consider only colleges that offer lots of grants – consider applying to several schools and choose the one with the best aid package)
    Federal Subsidized Loans
    Federal Unsubsidized Loans

    If all that fails……..I personally would consider going part time and paying as you go. Believe me, if you go to school and take on large debt loads (particularly private loans), it will color your start in life and not for the good.

    Posted by GD on April 13th, 2009 at 4:40 pm |

   
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to comment.
Your Reply:

Secured by Super-CAPTCHA © 2009 MLW & Associates, LLP. All rights reserved.