Shocking, I know.
Pick your jaws up off of the floor; Young would be far and away a better member of Congress than Baron Hill.
Blue Indiana has a post up ripping Todd Young for, well, daring to say that things aren’t going so well in the grand adventure that Baron and Barack have taken us on since the start of the year.
Where to begin…
The News and Tribune published a puff-piece a few days ago that took a look at the fledgling candidacy of Todd “I know Dan Quayle” Young, the political neophyte from Carmel Bloomington, Indiana who has pledged to run in the Ninth District next year.
The interesting thing about the interview isn’t what Young says, as much as it is what he doesn’t say. Namely, anything at all. Here’s a sampling:
“There’s no silver bullet to turn things around,” he said. “But there are some common sense steps we can take.”
Sounds great! Like what, Todd? The national debt, you say?
“Essentially our standards of living will go down,” Young said. “We have to pay it off or it just gets passed on.”
Continuing to add to the national debt will result in higher taxes which Young is opposed to. Debt is not just a financial dilemma – it’s a moral issue to Young.
“We are better people than to borrow from our kids,” he said.
Hm. Good point. So what are you planning to do about it?
National security is a top concern, though he wants to hear testimony before Congress from military leadership before stating his opinion on what America should do about Afghanistan.
At some point, Young believes definitive action will have to be taken to keep Iran from possessing nuclear weapons, but he said the situation hasn’t escalated to that point yet.
Wait, what happened to the debt issue? Your plan to bring down the debt is military action in Iran? That doesn’t seem to make much sen…
Americans should be free to shop for insurance across state lines, all businesses should be treated to the same tax breaks and medical liability reform needs to be pushed, Young said.
A combination of the three would bring more people under the health coverage umbrella, he said. But Young added the working poor could still not afford health coverage even with the plan he suggests, so Americans should accept the government will have to subsidize benefits for some, he said.
Wait, what about Iran and those nuclear weapons? And you’re for subsidizing benefits? Now let me get this straight…
Young believes by touting fresh ideas and declaring his candidacy early, he’ll be a formidable opponent for Hill next November.
…and, fin.
I’ll give Todd some props, especially as the lowly law student I am — he sure can spot some issues! The problem, of course, is when it comes to providing anything close to an answer to the problems facing the Ninth District, our humble Hoosier State, or the nation as a whole.
And lest you think the article left out Todd’s slam-bang plans, a quick jaunt over to his faux-Obama website reveals an issue page that highlights little, and provides leadership on even less. This, for example, is the entirety of Todd’s “plan” to solve not only the ballooning national debt, but any and all problems associated with the U.S. Constitution:
Make Congress deliberate before it acts. Congress will have to slow down. This means that Congress will give more careful consideration to how it spends your hard-earned tax dollars.
Empower citizens to participate. Bills will shrink, be less complicated, and contain fewer subjects, so that We the People can actually read them, too.
Stop the corrupt tit-for-tat Washington politics. Fewer bad proposals will be passed due to “log-rolling.”
Restore transparency and integrity to spending. No more secret clauses or pork-barrel earmarks will be inserted into bills at the last moment.
Awe-inspiring, eh?
First of all, let me say that I won’t go so far as to compare Young’s website to that of Obama. Striking visual motif similarities aside, Young’s website has no online community full of crazed Kool-Aid drinking lefties ready to drive the country into the ground.
Read more after the leap.
But, anyway, there’s a whole lot of selective quoting and quoting out of context going on in the Blue Indiana post. We also don’t get to see the full text of the interview from the News & Tribune, so it’s not clear whether anything more substantive on various issues was said by Young, but simply not included in the article for whatever reason.
The interview was done by the same reporter that last week did a story about Baron Hill’s assertion that ObamaCare doesn’t cut Medicare, but never checked to see if Hill’s claim was true (it isn’t). In light of that recent story from that particular reporter, one wonders about what was reported (and what wasn’t) in Young’s interview.
Young’s website doesn’t say more, it’s true; it’s strikingly devoid of in-depth examinations of the basic campaign bullet points. Sort of like many other campaign websites out there, including Baron’s.
I’m particularly reminded of a cartoon I found and posted way back in April.
It sort of says it all:
As Obama drives the car off the proverbial fiscal cliff, the Republican elephant screams “NOOOOO!!!!!”
Why? Because huge deficits that we can’t pay for (many times the size of Bush’s deficits, which Democrats spent eight years complaining about) are bad, particularly when they go on forever, aren’t being reduced, and are going to get bigger with huge new spending plans and entitlements.
You don’t need in-depth bullet points or campaign white papers or huge paragraphs on a website to want to shout “NOOOOO!!!!!” at the top of your lungs to the spending spree that Barack Obama and Baron Hill have embarked upon in the past year.
And regardless of who wins the primary in May and is the candidate on the ballot against Baron come November, they’re going to be doing a lot of campaigning along the lines of “NOOOOO!!!!!”
When you’re facing Baron and Barack’s fiscal nightmare, what else is there to say?
