In lieu of the potential Coats candidacy, Rothenberg has an update:

Former Sen. Dan Coats’ (R) likely entry into the Indiana Senate race puts another seat into play for Republicans.

Coats last served in the Senate a decade ago and Democrats are already attacking him for living in Virginia since then, but the Republican should be a credible alternative for voters who are dissatisfied with the direction of the country and the party in power. Coats will need to put together his campaign quickly in order to compete with the $13 million Sen. Evan Bayh (D) had in the bank at the end of the year. But this has suddenly become a very interesting race. Move from Currently Safe to Narrow Advantage for the Incumbent Party.

I’m interested to see that Coats’ entry got this rating to move, but nothing else did.

Bayh’s bad polling against both Pence and Hostettler didn’t move it.

The national environment didn’t move it.

It was moved by a former Senator living outside of Indiana who now has a dozen days to get on the ballot.

That’s placing a lot of faith in the political abilities of a candidate relative to the political abilities of Evan Bayh. And the last time that Coats had to face Bayh, he ran away. I know it’s harsh to say that, but it’s what happened.

So I went and hunted for information on past election campaigns run by Senator Coats.

There are, to my count, seven such elections.

1980 4th District Congress
–Dan Coats: 120,055
–John Walda (D): 77,542

1982 4th District Congress
–Dan Coats: 110,115
–Roger Miller (D): 60,054

1984 4th District Congress
–Dan Coats: 129,674
–Michael Barnard (D): 82,053

1986 4th District Congress
–Dan Coats: 99,865
–Gregory Scher (D): 43,105

1988 4th District Congress
–Dan Coats: 132,843
–Jill Long (D): 80,915

Those are all impressive margins, true, but the 4th District of the 1980s is not that dissimilar to the 3rd District of today; it’s a very Republican district. Coats never had a competitive election as a Congressman.

As a Senator?

1990 Senate
–Dan Coats: 806,048
–Baron Hill (D): 696,639

1992 Senate
–Dan Coats: 1,267,972
–Joe Hogsett (D): 900,148

All results are taken from the Clerk of the House.

Baron Hill ran a relatively vigorous campaign (he campaigned by physically running the length of the state), but still lost by over 100,000 votes. He also gave Coats the closest thing to a competitive election that he ever faced, and that was a margin of about 8%.

So why is Dan Coats’ entry enough to move the rating when the national environment and the polling didn’t cause it to budge?

He hasn’t raised any money. He’s starting late. He hasn’t run a competitive election before (and declined to face Bayh last time). He has unfortunately baggage (lobbying, TARP, residency, etc).

There also hasn’t been a poll matching him up against Bayh, though polling has shown the race competitive with other potential November opponents (one of which is already running).

So where does that leave us?

We have a candidate with no money, no polling, no prior serious campaign experience, but who is being talked up by a bunch of GOP bigwigs.

Why?

I hope to learn the answer, since what I am seeing so far doesn’t convince me.

Interesting tidbits about the history of the GOP – Think you’re the smartest Republican in the room? Take the quiz and find out. Yes you too Sean Shepard and Ed Angleton even though you’re both Libertarians.

GOP Quiz #1

GOP Quiz #2

On this day 68 years ago Pearl Harbor was attacked.  This was our President’s response.

YouTube Preview Image

So I was reading The Hill this evening and while getting my political junkie fix, this story caught my eyes. Speaker Pelosi says “Americans could absorb increased deficit if it means jobs”.

From The Hill

Americans could be ready to “absorb” increases to the deficit if it means higher employment, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Tuesday.

As the Congress prepares to put together a new spending package focused on creating new jobs in the U.S., the Speaker said that while it’s a “false choice” to pose the situation facing lawmakers as a balance between jobs and increased deficits, Americans would rather have jobs.

“So if somebody has the idea that the percentage of GDP of what our national debt is will go up a bit, but they will now — and their neighbors and their children will — have jobs, I think they could absorb that,” Pelosi said in a conference call with liberal bloggers on Tuesday, audio of which was posted by ThinkProgress.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) has said that the lower chamber hopes to move a jobs package by the Christmas holiday recess. Democrats have begun exploring different options for creating jobs, especially as unemployment continues to rise while 2010, an election year for lawmakers, quickly approaches.

Pelosi said deficit growth has been “stunning,” but rejected the idea that a jobs bill would necessarily pose a threat to the deficit.

“We don’t subscribe to the idea that some are for deficit reduction and some are for job creation; we think, again, as I said at the beginning, that’s a false choice,” she said. “We’re never going to decrease the deficit until we create jobs, bring revenue into the Treasury, stimulate the economy so we have growth.”

The Speaker said Democrats must also “shed any weakness” about being confrontational on the issue out of fear that the party would be labeled as insensitive to the deficit.

Pelosi suggested, too, that if lawmakers are reluctant to spend for job creation, similar problems that plagued the U.S. during the Great Depression may strike again.

“If we pull our punch, as they did in the mid-’30s, we shouldn’t be surprised if history repeats itself,” she explained.

“It’s a very important debate for us to have in this country, and I would hope that the president’s speech would be a balance between job creation and sensitive to deficit reduction,” Pelosi added. “But I think if anybody is asked in the public, ‘Would you rather have a job or a percentage of GDP or our national debt will go up a little bit?,’ I think everybody wants a job.”

Let’s look at this a minute shall we? Pelosi has offered different packages none of which did nothing to stimulate the economy, but only created more government and more debt. The last stimulus package hasn’t accomplished anything, save for creating jobs and allocating money to over 400 non-existent congressional districts, and now she wants Stimulus Package Part 2 “The Quest for More Money”. The House passed “Health Care Reform” which, if signed into law, will cause nothing but more government and red tape including the creation or expansion of over 130 agencies. Yeah, because this is what the people want!

Read more after the leap.

Marek Edelman, hero of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, has died at 90 years old. Edelman was a leader in the hopeless fight by Jews against ruthless Nazi occupying forces. The Jews, poorly trained, starving, only 220 strong and armed with pistols and homemade bombs, held off the Wehrmacht for three weeks.

The New York Times describes the heroic struggle:

The fighting continued for three weeks. On one side were 220 ghetto fighters, hungry and relatively untrained youths deployed in 22 units. Each unit had a pistol, five grenades and five homemade bottle bombs. They also had two mines and one submachine gun.

Ranged against them, on a daily average, were 36 German officers and 2,054 others with an arsenal that included 82 machine guns, 135 submachine guns and 1,358 rifles along with armored vehicles, artillery and air power used to set the ghetto ablaze.

(Read more after the leap)

I originally posted this a couple of years back.

For a long time, I subscribed to CNN’s breaking news email alerts (at least I did until they started considering Paris Hilton breaking news but not things that were happening in Washington or on Wall Street, so I unsubscribed).

Eight years ago today, I got a great many breaking news emails.

I have them saved, and rereading them is a chilling and haunting account of that day.

I have every email saved from September 11 to the fall of Kabul, but I will repost the September 11 ones and those for the immediately following days.

I repost them today, because I think that we should all read and remember. It is too easy to forget and too simple to exploit.

Think back to that day.

Remember what you were doing.

What you saw.

What you felt.

What you thought in those chaotic early hours when nothing was clear and everything was surreal and the fog of war obscured for the first time in almost two centuries three locations on American soil.

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 06:55:02 -0400
From: BreakingNews@CNN.COM
To: TEXTBREAKINGNEWS@CNNIMAIL4.CNN.COM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

– Iraq claims U.S. spy plane shot down; Pentagon confirms losing contact with unmanned craft. Details to come.

I include this only out of a sense of irony; Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks, but it was the first breaking news email I got that day.

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 08:52:02 -0400
From: BreakingNews@CNN.COM
To: TEXTBREAKINGNEWS@CNNIMAIL4.CNN.COM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

– World trade center damaged; unconfirmed reports say a plane has crashed into tower. Details to come.

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:21:02 -0400
From: BreakingNews@CNN.COM
To: TEXTBREAKINGNEWS@CNNIMAIL4.CNN.COM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

– Second plane crashes into World Trade Center.

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:23:02 -0400
From: BreakingNews@CNN.COM
To: TEXTBREAKINGNEWS@CNNIMAIL4.CNN.COM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

– FBI investigating reports of foul play in World Trade Center plane crashes, according to the Associated Press. Details to come.

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:32:02 -0400
From: BreakingNews@CNN.COM
To: TEXTBREAKINGNEWS@CNNIMAIL4.CNN.COM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

– Sources tell CNN one of two planes that crashed into World Trade Center was an American Airlines 767.

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:42:02 -0400
From: BreakingNews@CNN.COM
To: TEXTBREAKINGNEWS@CNNIMAIL4.CNN.COM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

– President Bush calls plane crashes at World Trade Center a terrorist act.

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:46:02 -0400
From: BreakingNews@CNN.COM
To: TEXTBREAKINGNEWS@CNNIMAIL4.CNN.COM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

– White House evactuated. Details to come.

Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:47:03 -0400
From: BreakingNews@CNN.COM
To: TEXTBREAKINGNEWS@CNNIMAIL4.CNN.COM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

– Fire reported on National Mall in Washington

The cameras that the networks use are all mounted on a single building, and from their perspective the smoke coming from where the plane had struck the Pentagon appeared to either be coming from the National Mall or from the State Department.

(Read more after the leap)

It’s wet and rainy where I am, but that’s not getting my spirits down on this day in which we celebrate our freedom!  Remember, this isn’t just the 4th of July, this is the day we celebrate our American Independence!

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

From Arthur Laffer in the Wall Street Journal (if the article is too much economist-speak for you, scroll down to the bottom of the quoted text for the graph and the paragraph in bold):

Rahm Emanuel was only giving voice to widespread political wisdom when he said that a crisis should never be “wasted.” Crises enable vastly accelerated political agendas and initiatives scarcely conceivable under calmer circumstances. So it goes now.

Here we stand more than a year into a grave economic crisis with a projected budget deficit of 13% of GDP. That’s more than twice the size of the next largest deficit since World War II. And this projected deficit is the culmination of a year when the federal government, at taxpayers’ expense, acquired enormous stakes in the banking, auto, mortgage, health-care and insurance industries.

With the crisis, the ill-conceived government reactions, and the ensuing economic downturn, the unfunded liabilities of federal programs — such as Social Security, civil-service and military pensions, the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation, Medicare and Medicaid — are over the $100 trillion mark. With U.S. GDP and federal tax receipts at about $14 trillion and $2.4 trillion respectively, such a debt all but guarantees higher interest rates, massive tax increases, and partial default on government promises.

But as bad as the fiscal picture is, panic-driven monetary policies portend to have even more dire consequences. We can expect rapidly rising prices and much, much higher interest rates over the next four or five years, and a concomitant deleterious impact on output and employment not unlike the late 1970s.

About eight months ago, starting in early September 2008, the Bernanke Fed did an abrupt about-face and radically increased the monetary base — which is comprised of currency in circulation, member bank reserves held at the Fed, and vault cash — by a little less than $1 trillion. The Fed controls the monetary base 100% and does so by purchasing and selling assets in the open market. By such a radical move, the Fed signaled a 180-degree shift in its focus from an anti-inflation position to an anti-deflation position.

The percentage increase in the monetary base is the largest increase in the past 50 years by a factor of 10 (see chart nearby). It is so far outside the realm of our prior experiential base that historical comparisons are rendered difficult if not meaningless. The currency-in-circulation component of the monetary base — which prior to the expansion had comprised 95% of the monetary base — has risen by a little less than 10%, while bank reserves have increased almost 20-fold. Now the currency-in-circulation component of the monetary base is a smidgen less than 50% of the monetary base. Yikes!

(Read more after the leap)

d-day01Today is the 65th anniversary of the invasion of Omaha Beach at Normandy.  As we recall the sacrifice of the American troops that day, take the time to read the letter that General Dwight Eisenhower wrote to the troops just before the invasion.

SUPREME HEADQUARTERS ALLIED EXPEDITIONARY FORCE

Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen of the Allied Expeditionary Force!

You are about to embark upon the Great Crusade, toward which we have striven these many months. The eyes of the world are upon you. The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. In company with our brave Allies and brothers-in-arms on other Fronts, you will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security for ourselves in a free world.

Your task will not be an easy one. Your enemy is well trained, well equipped and battle-hardened. He will fight savagely.

But this is the year 1944! Much has happened since the Nazi triumphs of 1940-41. The United Nations have inflicted upon the Germans great defeats, in open battle, man-to-rnan. Our air offensive has seriously reduced their strength in the air and their capacity to wage war on the ground. Our Home Fronts have given us an overwhelming superiority in weapons and munitions of war, and placed at our disposal great reserves of trained fighting men. The tide has turned! The free men of the world are marching together to Victory!

I have full confidence in your courage, devotion to duty and skill in battle. We will accept nothing less than full Victory!

Good Luck! And let us all beseech the blessing of Almighty God upon this great and noble undertaking.

Dwight D. Eisenhower

I was reminded of my college history professor’s biography of Homer Capehart a couple of weeks ago when I saw the unusual book cover in an Indianapolis local TV news segment. On a lark, I found my copy and decided to reread it. I am glad I did.

Homer Capehart by William Pickett

Who was Homer Capehart? I didn’t know before I bought and read this book some 15 years ago. He was the son of a poor farmer in southern Indiana who made a small fortune in the jukebox and radio industries by ingenuity and salesmanship. In the mid-1930’s he decided to become involved in Republican politics, and did so by holding the “Cornfield Conference” on his southern Indiana farm that drew at least 15,000 Republicans from across the state and nation. He galvanized the Republican Party to oppose the New Deal and gave energy to a Party that was down and out.

Capehart's Cornfield Conference

Capehart became more involved in Republican politics and narrowly won a Senate seat in 1944. He served in the Senate for 18 years before losing that seat to Birch Bayh, Jr.

As Professor Emeritus William Pickett told the story of Capehart’s revitalization of the Republican Party in the late 30’s and 40’s, I saw many parallels to our situation today. Pickett writes:

Capehart helped lead the national party out of the wilderness by showing its confused leaders that conservatism, not me-too-ism, was the way to the hearts of many American voters. (p. 50)

I don’t think that there is a better prescription for the Republican Party today than that observation.

But the parallels between the 1930’s and now continue below the fold.

Obama's Honorary Degree

Several Presidents of the United States have given commencement addresses at Notre Dame. In recent years, all of them have been pro-life (Bush and Reagan). Until now.

But the question I would like to see answered is a simple one.

How many protesters were arrested when Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush came to speak?

We’ve already seen twenty-one individuals arrested at Notre Dame before Obama’s visit:

Former Republican presidential candidate Alan Keyes, a Roman Catholic priest and 19 others were arrested yesterday after they marched onto the University of Notre Dame campus to protest President Barack Obama’s commencement speech tomorrow.

“Notre Dame is arresting a priest,” the Rev. Norman Weslin, founder of the Lambs of Christ abortion-protest group, said as Notre Dame security personnel put plastic restraints on his wrists. “Why are you arresting a priest for trying to stop the killing of a baby? You’ve got it all backward.”

Weslin, 78, who has been arrested dozens of times at abortion-clinic blockades, was carried off on a stretcher. He and two others were charged with resisting law enforcement.

All 21 arrested were charged with trespassing. Keyes and five others were ordered held in the St. Joseph County Jail until Monday because it was their second time being arrested on a charge of trespassing at Notre Dame, said Sgt. Bill Redman, St. Joseph County Police Department spokesman. Bond was set at $250 for the others.

None of those arrested were students.

The arrests marked the third consecutive Friday that people were arrested as they protested the school’s decision to give Obama, who supports abortion rights and embryonic stem-cell research, an honorary degree and have him address graduates.

St. Joseph Superior Court Judge Michael Scopelitis issued an order Thursday changing how bond is set for a person charged with a crime while already out on bond on a pending charge.

Previously, such a person could have been released under a presumptive bond schedule. Now they must await a probable cause hearing, Scopelitis said.

The judge said county judges already were considering the change because of people being arrested multiple times and being released without appearing before a judge.

The fact there could be numerous arrests this weekend surrounding Notre Dame’s commencement brought the issue “into focus,” Scopelitis said.

Brought the issue into focus my rear end.

I somehow think that folks that protested Bush and Reagan weren’t given the same sort of treatment that folks that are protesting Obama are getting. Certainly not from the Democrat-dominated power structure in St. Joseph County and South Bend.

(Read more after the leap)

ObamaHot Air catches this one:

I don’t recall any other news agency picking up on the fact that either the President didn’t bother to find out when the botched Bay of Pigs invasion occurred — or forgot his own birthday. Neither made Obama look like a genius:

Ortega denounced the U.S.-backed attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro’s new Communist government in Cuba in 1961, a history of US racism and what he called suffocating U.S. economic policies in the region.

In his 17-minute address to the summit, Obama departed from his prepared remarks to mildly rebuke Ortega.

“To move forward, we cannot let ourselves be prisoners of past disagreements. I’m grateful that President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old. Too often, an opportunity to build a fresh partnership of the Americas has been undermined by stale debates. We’ve all heard these arguments before.”

Actually, the president misspoke on the sequence of events in Cuba. The invasion of CIA-trained rebels at the Bay of Pigs in Cuba occurred in April 1961. Obama was born August 4, 1961.

Even forgiving the stupid (and easily checkable) mistake on the dates, Obama’s insistence on personalizing the criticism seems very strange. He went to the Summit of the Americas to represent the United States of America, not Barack Obama. Who cares when Obama was born? What does that have to do with the price of sugar in the Western Hemisphere, anyway? And why was the only significant rebuttal to Daniel Ortega’s anti-US diatribe from Obama focused on himself personally, and not defending the United States?

And honestly, how hard is it to study a little on the bigger events in Latin American history and get the dates right before opening his mouth and proving himself embarrassingly ignorant?

It’s all about him, even when it isn’t, and even when he can’t even get the facts (as they relate to him) correct.

Secured by Super-CAPTCHA © 2009 MLW & Associates, LLP. All rights reserved.